Warranty & Support
+5.0 Power QueenECO-WORTHY 1 Year (10); Power Queen 5 Years (8).
Brand comparison
ECO-WORTHY vs Power Queen
ECO-WORTHY scores 5.6 across 19 products; Power Queen scores 5.4 across 12. They overlap in lifepo4 batteries. That is 26% of what ECO-WORTHY sells and 67% of what Power Queen sells. ECO-WORTHY leads on lifespan, Power Queen on warranty & support.
All 20 ECO-WORTHY products
ECO-WORTHY
19 of 20 products scored · $77 – $3,800
Buy Now- Lifespan — 8.0 against 6.0
- Features — 6.0 against 5.0
5.6
5.4
All 12 Power Queen products
Power Queen
12 of 12 products scored · $129 – $733
Buy Now- Warranty & Support — 6.0 against 1.0
- Efficiency — 7.0 against 6.0
Across everything we scored, ECO-WORTHY edges ahead by 0.19 — too close to call.
Both brands also sell into Power Inverters and Charge Controllers. Neither side carries enough scored products there for a median we would publish, so this comparison does not cover them.
Too close to call
has the edge · 5.6 vs 5.4
ECO-WORTHY is ahead by a nose: 0.19 points, less than a score moves between two sizes of the same system. The trade-offs below decide it.
Pick ECO-WORTHY when
Lifespan matters most8.0vs6.0
Pick Power Queen when
Warranty & support matters most6.0vs1.0
Scored 13 October 2026 from published specs and owner reviews. We don't buy or test units. How we score
Most common complaints
From owner reviews of each brand's top-scored product in LiFePO4 Batteries.
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 280Ah Metal Case LiFePO4 Battery
- Bluetooth BMS has no password option
- Restricted access to BMS settings
- About 7 lb heavier than the plastic-case 280 Ah
Power Queen 24V 125Ah Smart Self-Heating LiFePO4 Battery
- Arrived at 56 percent charge and needed topping off
- Tight fit made it hard to lift out of the compartment
What only ECO-WORTHY sells — and only Power Queen
Not a loss for either brand. If you need one of these, the choice is already made.
Where ECO-WORTHY and Power Queen differ
Median scores on a 0–10 scale. Each row is one criterion.
Lifespan
+2.0 ECO-WORTHYPower Queen all scored 6.0.
Efficiency
+1.0 Power QueenECO-WORTHY 2.0–8.0 vs Power Queen 2.0–10.0.
Features
+1.0 ECO-WORTHYECO-WORTHY 2.0–10.0 vs Power Queen 1.0–7.0.
Capacity
+0.5 Power QueenECO-WORTHY 1.0–10.0 vs Power Queen 5.0–9.0.
Operating Range
tiedECO-WORTHY: 16 of 19 scored products carry this criterion.
Verification
tiedECO-WORTHY 2.0–8.0 vs Power Queen 2.0–6.0.
Criterion 8
Not enough data on either side. ECO-WORTHY 0 of 19; Power Queen 0 of 12.
The scores above are our reading of the evidence below. This is the evidence.
Safety listings are recorded per product from the certifier's own directory, by model, not from the maker's wording. Most of the listings in this category can be checked in Intertek's directory of listed products.
Warranty terms
ECO-WORTHY
19 of 19
Power Queen
12 of 12
What ECO-WORTHY and Power Queen owners report
Independent sources pooled per brand. Each row is one source.
N of M = how many scored products carry the brand-level reading shown, out of all scored.
Power Queen all scored 5.0.
Source details
ECO-WORTHY
- Reddit owners mostly report Eco-Worthy batteries holding their rated capacity and are less sure of its electronics.
- In an r/SolarDIY thread owners said their 100 Ah batteries tested to capacity and that two 12 V 260 Ah batteries in series stayed balanced for a year (February 2024), a UK owner measured nearly 102 Ah from a 12.8 V 100 Ah battery after a year on standby against 104.3 Ah new (June 2025), and in a Renogy-or-Eco-Worthy thread an owner called its batteries and panels fine and its charge controllers and inverters hit and miss (February 2026).
Brand rollup across scored products.
15 of 19 scored products carry this reading
Power Queen
- Reddit owners report mixed results with Power Queen batteries.
- An r/overlanding owner said a 100 Ah stopped holding a charge after 15 months of light use and that Power Queen, though responsive, would not honor the warranty (2024), an r/batteries owner of a 12.8 V 100 Ah bought as a CPAP backup found its BMS tripped on a general-purpose lithium charger, with Power Queen pointing to its own 20 A charger (2024), and an r/SolarDIY owner of a 25.6 V 50 Ah said it arrived with the BMS shut off and had to be jump-started before its Bluetooth showed 99 percent charge (December 2024), while an r/LiFePO4 commenter called Power Queen decent for a trolling motor (2025).
Brand rollup across scored products.
12 of 12 scored products carry this reading
ECO-WORTHY: 6 of 19 scored products carry this reading; Power Queen: 10 of 12 scored products carry this reading.
Source details
ECO-WORTHY
- On DIY Solar Forum, an owner running two Eco-Worthy 5000 W inverters in split phase reported them working fine after a year (January 2025), while a buyer of twelve 410 W panels found 7 underperforming and waited about 40 days for replacements (August 2025), and an owner of five 12 V 280 Ah batteries reported 3 faulty from the start (August 2025).
- The Solar Lab, which carries an Eco-Worthy affiliate link and a discount code, found the 48 V server-rack battery handled surges beyond its rating but failed its low-temperature cut-off test, and its calls to Eco-Worthy support went to voicemail (2025).
Brand rollup across scored products.
6 of 19 scored products carry this reading
Power Queen
- On Expedition Portal and DIY Solar Forum, the owner of a 12 V 100 Ah trolling-motor battery bought in November 2023 measured 106 Ah but found the BMS cutting off charge near 13.9 V with its cells out of balance
- Power Queen maintained the battery was fine, and he returned it through Amazon for a refund (February 2024).
- On Swimbait Underground an angler running three 12.8 V 100 Ah batteries on his trolling motor posted positive first impressions (July 2024), and on DIY Solar Forum owners of the 12 V 200 Ah reported no problems in early use (December 2021).
Brand rollup across scored products.
10 of 12 scored products carry this reading
YouTube
tiedECO-WORTHY: 13 of 19 scored products carry this reading; Power Queen: 5 of 12 scored products carry this reading.
Source details
ECO-WORTHY
- Every tester found carries a tie.
- Will Prowse, whose videos disclose paid promotion or free product and carry affiliate links, found Eco-Worthy's $799 48 V server-rack battery passed his deep-dive tests (2025, about 154,000 views).
- Mike Builds, whose Cubix 100 video is marked as paid promotion and links Eco-Worthy's affiliate program, measured 99.08 Ah at 0.2C and called it a beast (July 2026, about 218,000 views).
- There's A Trick For That, which links the battery through Amazon affiliate links, drew 315 Ah, 105 percent of rating, from a 12 V 300 Ah (April 2026, about 25,000 views).
Brand rollup across scored products.
13 of 19 scored products carry this reading
Power Queen
- Every tester found carries a tie.
- Will Prowse, whose videos disclose paid promotion or free product and carry affiliate links, opened a Power Queen 12 V 200 Ah and found good build quality and consistent cells but no low-temperature charge protection (2022, about 600,000 views).
- HOBOTECH, which Power Queen's store badges as recommended and which linked Power Queen batteries with its own discount codes, reviewed and tore down the 12 V 300 Ah (December 2022) and the 12 V 100 Ah trolling-motor battery (about 35,000 views).
- Mike Builds, with Amazon affiliate links, paid $215 for a 12 V 100 Ah Bluetooth model and found its low-temperature cut-off worked (March 2025, about 8,800 views).
Brand rollup across scored products.
5 of 12 scored products carry this reading
Amazon
tiedECO-WORTHY: 2 of 19 scored products carry this reading; Power Queen: 2 of 12 scored products carry this reading.
Source details
ECO-WORTHY
- Eco-Worthy's Amazon store shows no store-wide rating; its two largest listings read 4.4 from 647 ratings for the 12 V 100 Ah battery and 4.4 from 576 for the 400 W solar kit (October 2026).
Brand rollup across scored products.
2 of 19 scored products carry this reading
Power Queen
- Power Queen's Amazon US listings for its 12 V batteries, sold through its own Power Queen-US storefront, read 4.4 to 4.8 across nine listings with about 1,480 ratings between them, a weighted average near 4.55, from 4.4 on 339 ratings for the 12 V 100 Ah trolling-motor Group 31 to 4.8 on 227 for a 12 V 100 Ah Group 31 RV listing (October 2026).
Brand rollup across scored products.
2 of 12 scored products carry this reading
Owner reviews
Not enough data on either side. ECO-WORTHY: 0 of 19 scored products carry this reading; Power Queen: 0 of 12 scored products carry this reading.
Best ECO-WORTHY vs best Power Queen, category by category
The three best-scoring products each brand sells in every category they both compete in, ranked by overall score.
LiFePO4 Batteries
See all LiFePO4 Batteries products
ECO-WORTHY leads
6.1
5th of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- 3,584 Wh in one 12 V battery
- 200 A maximum continuous discharge220 A peak for 10 seconds
- Built-in Bluetooth app monitoring
- Up to 4 in series or 4 in parallel8 batteries per bank
Drawbacks
- 200 A continuous is only 0.71C on 280 Ah
- No depth of discharge or end-of-life capacity published for the cycle rating
- Cycle claims differ: 6,000+ on eco-worthy.comup to 15,000 on Amazon
- No CAN or RS485 portno self-heating and no published IP rating
6.1
4th of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- Self-heating with two modesset from the app
- Built-in Bluetooth 5.0 with remote switching
- IP67 rating
- 625 A for 1 second on a 125 A BMS
Drawbacks
- Heating needs at least 10 A of charge currentor over 20% charge in Smart Warm-up mode
- No end-of-life capacity published for the 4,000-cycle rating
- Page says it cuts off discharging in freezing conditions while the spec table rates discharge to -4°F
- No CAN or RS485 port
5.8
14th of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- One 25.6 V battery in place of two 12 V units in series
- 58.0 Wh per pound on the spec weight
- 100 A BMS1.0C on 100 Ah
- Bluetooth app and SOC LED display built in
Drawbacks
- Spec table's 10 V discharge cut-off is a 12 V figurenot a 25.6 V one
- No depth of discharge or end-of-life capacity published for the up to 15,000 cycles
- Weight given as 44.1 lb in the spec table and 45.6 lb in the page text
- Product page links a 12 V 100 Ah manualnot this battery's
5.9
10th of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- 58.0 Wh per pound at 22.05 lb on the spec table
- IP65 protection class
- Up to four in series and four in parallelto 51.2 V 400 Ah
- 100 A continuous charge and discharge400 A for one second in the manual
Drawbacks
- Spec table gives 22.05 lbthe page's feature text 24.25 lb
- Feature text gives 8,000 cycles at 80% depth of discharge, the spec table 6,000
- No end-of-life capacity published for the cycle rating
- No low-temperature charge cut-offthough charging is rated only from 32°F (0°C)
5.8
14th of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- Built-in Bluetooth monitoring of voltagecurrent and state of charge
- Low-temperature charge cut-off at 19.4°F-7°C), releasing at 28.4°F (-2°C
- Up to 16 batteries in series or parallelto 48 V
- 100 A continuous charge and discharge
Drawbacks
- No depth of discharge or end-of-life capacity published for the cycle rating
- Datasheet gives 4,000 cycles in its table and 3,000 to 5,000 in its text
- Cut-off at 19.4°F sits below the 32°F charging floor in the spec table
- No CAN or RS485 portno self-heating and no published IP rating
5.6
21st of 37 in LiFePO4
Strengths
- 4,096 Wh in one 12 V battery
- 71.6 Wh per pound at 57.17 lb
- Built-in Bluetooth 5.0 app monitoring
- 1,000 A for 1 second3.13C
Drawbacks
- 200 A BMS is 0.63C on 320 Ahcapping loads at 2,560 W
- Weight 57.17 lb on the spec table52.47 lb in the FAQ
- No end-of-life capacity published for the 4,000-cycle rating
- Charging stops below 32°F0°C), with no self-heating
ECO-WORTHY vs Power Queen: the numbers
5.6
Products scored19 of 20
Price range$77 – $3,800
5.4
Products scored12 of 12
Price range$129 – $733
ECO-WORTHY vs Power Queen: common questions
Is ECO-WORTHY or Power Queen better?
ECO-WORTHY 5.6 from 19 scored products; Power Queen 5.4 from 12. Too close to call overall: ECO-WORTHY has the edge by 0.19, which is inside the margin, so the difference is in the criteria.
What is the biggest difference between ECO-WORTHY and Power Queen?
Warranty & Support: ECO-WORTHY medians 1.0, Power Queen medians 6.0 (Power Queen by 5.0).
Which is better for lifespan, ECO-WORTHY or Power Queen?
ECO-WORTHY on lifespan — ECO-WORTHY 8.0, Power Queen 6.0.
Which is better for efficiency, ECO-WORTHY or Power Queen?
Power Queen on efficiency — ECO-WORTHY 6.0, Power Queen 7.0.
What does ECO-WORTHY make that Power Queen does not?
ECO-WORTHY sells all-in-one off-grid inverters, server-rack and wall batteries, rigid solar panels, and flexible solar panels; Power Queen does not, in the products we scored.
What does Power Queen make that ECO-WORTHY does not?
Power Queen sells dc-dc chargers; ECO-WORTHY does not, in the products we scored.
Which ECO-WORTHY and Power Queen lifepo4 batteries should I buy?
ECO-WORTHY: ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 280Ah Metal Case LiFePO4 Battery. Power Queen: Power Queen 24V 125Ah Smart Self-Heating LiFePO4 Battery.
How does Stuff VS Things score ECO-WORTHY and Power Queen?
Our own product medians: 19 ECO-WORTHY and 12 Power Queen. A criterion is compared only where both brands clear the floor.
Other comparisons
Scores calculated 13 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them · · How we score