The ALLPOWERS SF100 scores 3.6 and ranks 22nd of 23 in Flexible Solar Panels; the BLUETTI PV100 FX scores 3.5 and ranks 23rd of 23 in Flexible Solar Panels. The SF100 leads on features.
The ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV100 FX reading covers the whole brand.
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
r/SolarDIY: an owner of the 400 W folding panel read at best the mid-270s W at midday under a clear sky on a third-party station, about 68 percent of rated (June 2023)
Replies: commenters found its 37.4 V and 10.6 A within the station's input and asked whether shade or a battery above 75 percent was limiting it (June 2023)
r/GoRVing: an owner whom ALLPOWERS offered a station for review found its 100 W folding panel light, well made and quick to set up, but hard to open in wind (2024)
BLUETTIPV100 FX
Read the full summary
r/SurvivalGear: an owner of an AC60 and PV200 read about 150 W of input once a part-cloudy sky cleared and 40 to 50 W under passing cloud, and liked both (September 2023)
Caveat: the same owner called it an initial evaluation and said he would need longer use to judge durability (September 2023)
GoogleALLPOWERS SF100: 5BLUETTI PV100 FX: 5
The ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV100 FX reading covers the whole brand.
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
OutdoorGearLab: bought its own SP012 100 W folding panel and earns commission through links; it held 40.3 W in direct sun, near the top of the test, and put 56.8 Wh into a test battery (July 2024)
Shortfalls: OutdoorGearLab measured about 7 W in indirect light and noted the SP012 has no kickstand (July 2024)
The Gadgeteer: tested a 400 W SP037 that ALLPOWERS supplied, with an Amazon code; read 42 V open-circuit on an overcast 31 °F day and liked its kickstands and cable pocket, but measured no watts (January 2023)
BLUETTIPV100 FX
Read the full summary
StorageReview: measured a 295 W peak from the PV350 in clear overhead sun and 38 W through tree cover (September 2023); the review carries Amazon links and does not say how the panel was obtained
MountainIQ: read a 170 W maximum from a PV200 at midday in spring and charged an EB55 from flat in 3 hours 45 minutes (November 2023); BLUETTI sent the panel
Bushwalking Blog: read up to 167 W from a PV200 in Melbourne autumn, and disliked the missing fourth kickstand, splash-only waterproofing and the handle (May 2023); BLUETTI provided the panel
The BLUETTI PV100 FX reading covers the whole brand.
ALLPOWERSSF100
Liked
Output held up well when angled to the sun (Urban Survivor)
Flexible enough to roll up (SmitHVAC)
Handy for camping or a vehicle roof (SmitHVAC)
Complaints
Output drops sharply lying flat (Urban Survivor)
Read the full summary
Urban Survivor: read about 47 W lying flat and 83 W angled to the sun from the SF100, about 83 percent of rating (December 2023, about 8,900 views); the description carries Amazon affiliate links
SmitHVAC: tested the SF100 and SF200 laid flat and called them convenient for camping or a vehicle roof (April 2024, about 16,600 views)
Tie: SmitHVAC says ALLPOWERS sent the panels, YouTube labels the video paid promotion and it carries a 10 percent code, so it is not independent (April 2024)
BLUETTIPV100 FX
Read the full summary
Wheels By The Ocean: read 460 W from a SORA 500 into an Elite 300 in Brisbane conditions (April 2026, about 8,600 views)
Tie: the video description carries BLUETTI affiliate links and a 5 percent discount code, so it is not independent
The ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers its product line; the BLUETTI PV100 FX reading covers its product line.
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
Listing: ALLPOWERS's own Amazon US file titled SF200 (B0FCMCL4L2) carries 21 W to 400 W options under one rating, 3.9 from 244 ratings (October 2026)
Themes: Amazon's review digest calls output and durability mixed, with one buyer reporting a failure after two months (October 2026); the star split sits behind sign-in
Second file: B0FX4BX82M, titled SF200 but merged with folding panels and a 21 W charger, shows 4.2 from 2,021 ratings (September 2026)
BLUETTIPV100 FX
Read the full summary
Listing: BLUETTI's own Amazon US store files its folding and flexible panels under one shared rating (B09B9RJLM7 and B0FS67DKV5 show the same count), 4.4 from 1,210 ratings (October 2026)
Split: 73 percent five-star, 14 four, 5 three, 2 two and 6 one-star across the shared panel file (October 2026)
ALLPOWERS SF100 vs BLUETTI PV100 FX: pros and cons
No other scored BLUETTI products in Flexible Solar Panels.
ALLPOWERSSF100 vs BLUETTIPV100 FX: common questions
Is the ALLPOWERS SF100 better than the BLUETTI PV100 FX?
On our scores, the ALLPOWERS SF100 is ahead, 3.6 against 3.5. The ALLPOWERS SF100 leads on features (6 against 3) and warranty & support (3 against 1).
Which is cheaper, the ALLPOWERS SF100 or the BLUETTI PV100 FX?
The ALLPOWERS SF100, at $113 against $164: $52 less.
Which has the longer warranty, the ALLPOWERS SF100 or the BLUETTI PV100 FX?
The ALLPOWERS SF100: 2 Years, against 1 Year.
What do owners say about the ALLPOWERS SF100 and the BLUETTI PV100 FX?
Across 4 independent sources scored for both, the ALLPOWERS SF100 is ahead on YouTube; the BLUETTI PV100 FX is ahead on Reddit and Amazon; Google is level.
More flexible solar panels comparisons
More head-to-heads with these two, plus the full brand comparison.
Scores calculated 17 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them · Researched and edited by Michael Ambrose · Unbroken Ads LLC · How we score