The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel scores 4.2 and ranks 16th of 23 in Flexible Solar Panels; the ALLPOWERS SF100 scores 3.6 and ranks 22nd of 23 in Flexible Solar Panels. The Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel leads on warranty & support, the SF100 on features.
The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel reading covers the whole brand; the ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers the whole brand.
BougeRVArch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel
Read the full summary
Panels: an r/SolarDIY owner who paid $132 each for several 200 W bifacial panels found visible busbar defects on three of them (July 2025)
Support: the same owner said BougeRV support sent replacements for the defective panels within a couple of days (July 2025)
Delivery: an r/solar poster said a charge controller was delivered to another address in his city and called BougeRV a ripoff (April 2026)
Owners: in an r/GoRVing thread on RV solar, several owners named BougeRV 200 W bifacial or TOPCon panels in their setups (November 2025)
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
r/SolarDIY: an owner of the 400 W folding panel read at best the mid-270s W at midday under a clear sky on a third-party station, about 68 percent of rated (June 2023)
Replies: commenters found its 37.4 V and 10.6 A within the station's input and asked whether shade or a battery above 75 percent was limiting it (June 2023)
r/GoRVing: an owner whom ALLPOWERS offered a station for review found its 100 W folding panel light, well made and quick to set up, but hard to open in wind (2024)
The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel reading covers its product line; the ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers the whole brand.
BougeRVArch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel
Read the full summary
OutdoorGearLab: bought its own unit of the earlier 10-busbar Arch 200W (23 percent cells, 58.1 x 31 in, 6.6 lb measured), not this Arch 2.0; it links Amazon with affiliate tags (July 2026)
Output: in a two-hour test at 6,500 ft it measured 166 W, 83 percent of the 200 W rating, scored it 77 of 100 and named it a Top Pick for mounting (July 2026)
Limits: the review notes it does not fold and is less efficient than fixed rigid panels; its buy link now points to the Arch 2.0 listing (July 2026)
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
OutdoorGearLab: bought its own SP012 100 W folding panel and earns commission through links; it held 40.3 W in direct sun, near the top of the test, and put 56.8 Wh into a test battery (July 2024)
Shortfalls: OutdoorGearLab measured about 7 W in indirect light and noted the SP012 has no kickstand (July 2024)
The Gadgeteer: tested a 400 W SP037 that ALLPOWERS supplied, with an Amazon code; read 42 V open-circuit on an overcast 31 °F day and liked its kickstands and cable pocket, but measured no watts (January 2023)
The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel reading covers the whole brand.
BougeRVArch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel
Read the full summary
Jeremiah Mcintosh: found the Yuma 200 W CIGS did not disappoint in low light or aimed at the sun against his 200 W foldables (April 2023, about 136,000 views)
Disclosure: he offers 15 percent off bougerv.com with the code McIntosh and links Amazon affiliate pages
The Off-Grid Mountain Homestead: tested a CIGS panel in full sun and cloud and called it very nice and ultra lightweight (September 2024, about 1,100 views)
Disclosure: he received the panel free and links it through Amazon Associates
StoneBroke Adventure: said the 24 V 200 W N-type bifacial outperformed its rating in real-world use (October 2025), in a video marked as including paid promotion
ALLPOWERSSF100
Liked
Output held up well when angled to the sun (Urban Survivor)
Flexible enough to roll up (SmitHVAC)
Handy for camping or a vehicle roof (SmitHVAC)
Complaints
Output drops sharply lying flat (Urban Survivor)
Read the full summary
Urban Survivor: read about 47 W lying flat and 83 W angled to the sun from the SF100, about 83 percent of rating (December 2023, about 8,900 views); the description carries Amazon affiliate links
SmitHVAC: tested the SF100 and SF200 laid flat and called them convenient for camping or a vehicle roof (April 2024, about 16,600 views)
Tie: SmitHVAC says ALLPOWERS sent the panels, YouTube labels the video paid promotion and it carries a 10 percent code, so it is not independent (April 2024)
The ALLPOWERS SF100 reading covers its product line.
BougeRVArch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel
Read the full summary
Rating: the 100 W Arch 2.0 listing shows 5.0 of 5 from 3 global ratings, all five-star, too few to read a pattern (October 2026)
Discount: one point off the star split because BougeRV runs an Amazon-order rewards page on its own site
ALLPOWERSSF100
Read the full summary
Listing: ALLPOWERS's own Amazon US file titled SF200 (B0FCMCL4L2) carries 21 W to 400 W options under one rating, 3.9 from 244 ratings (October 2026)
Themes: Amazon's review digest calls output and durability mixed, with one buyer reporting a failure after two months (October 2026); the star split sits behind sign-in
Second file: B0FX4BX82M, titled SF200 but merged with folding panels and a 21 W charger, shows 4.2 from 2,021 ratings (September 2026)
BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel vs ALLPOWERS SF100: pros and cons
BougeRVArch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel vs ALLPOWERSSF100: common questions
Is the BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel better than the ALLPOWERS SF100?
On our scores, the BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel is ahead, 4.2 against 3.6. The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel leads on warranty & support (6 against 3) and lifespan (3 against 1). The ALLPOWERS SF100 leads on features (6 against 2).
Which has the longer warranty, the BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel or the ALLPOWERS SF100?
The BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel: 5 Years, against 2 Years.
What do owners say about the BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel and the ALLPOWERS SF100?
Across 4 independent sources scored for both, the BougeRV Arch 2.0 100W Flexible Panel is ahead on Reddit and Google; YouTube and Amazon are level.
Scores calculated 17 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them · Researched and edited by Michael Ambrose · Unbroken Ads LLC · How we score