Product comparison · LiFePO4 Batteries

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery vs Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

The ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery scores 5.6 and ranks 14th of 29 in LiFePO4 Batteries; the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery scores 5.6 and ranks 14th of 29 in LiFePO4 Batteries. The EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery leads on lifespan, the 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery on warranty & support.

All 20 ECO-WORTHY products
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah LiFePO4 Battery

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

$500 · 14th of 29 in LiFePO4 Batteries

Buy Now
  • Lifespan — 8 against 6
5.6
vs
5.6
All 12 Power Queen products
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth LiFePO4 Battery

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

$733 · 14th of 29 in LiFePO4 Batteries

Buy Now
  • Warranty & Support — 6 against 4

Across everything we scored, ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery edges ahead by 0.00 — too close to call.

Too close to call

level · 5.6 vs 5.6

Level on the overall score. The trade-offs below decide it.

Pick the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery when

Lifespan matters8vs6

Price matters$500vs$733

Pick the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery when

Warranty & support matters6vs4

Features matters6vs4

Efficiency matters10vs8

Scored 13 October 2026 from published specs and owner reviews. We don't buy or test units. How we score

Where the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery and Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery differ

Scores on a 0–10 scale. Each row is one criterion, biggest difference first.

Efficiency

+2 Power Queen
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
8.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
10.0

Lifespan

+2 ECO-WORTHY
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
8.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
6.0

Features

+2 Power Queen
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
4.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
6.0

Warranty & Support

+2 Power Queen
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
4.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
6.0

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery: 3 Years · Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery: 5 Years.

Capacity

tied
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
9.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
9.0

Operating Range

tied
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
1.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
1.0

Verification

tied
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
2.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
2.0

Value

one side unscored
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
—
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
—

What ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery and Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery owners report

Independent sources, scored for each model. EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery on 4 of five, 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery on 4.

Reddit

+1 ECO-WORTHY
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
6.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
5.0

The ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery reading covers the whole brand; the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery reading covers the whole brand.

What they say

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

  • Reddit owners mostly report Eco-Worthy batteries holding their rated capacity and are less sure of its electronics.
  • In an r/SolarDIY thread owners said their 100 Ah batteries tested to capacity and that two 12 V 260 Ah batteries in series stayed balanced for a year (February 2024), a UK owner measured nearly 102 Ah from a 12.8 V 100 Ah battery after a year on standby against 104.3 Ah new (June 2025), and in a Renogy-or-Eco-Worthy thread an owner called its batteries and panels fine and its charge controllers and inverters hit and miss (February 2026).

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

  • Reddit owners report mixed results with Power Queen batteries.
  • An r/overlanding owner said a 100 Ah stopped holding a charge after 15 months of light use and that Power Queen, though responsive, would not honor the warranty (2024), an r/batteries owner of a 12.8 V 100 Ah bought as a CPAP backup found its BMS tripped on a general-purpose lithium charger, with Power Queen pointing to its own 20 A charger (2024), and an r/SolarDIY owner of a 25.6 V 50 Ah said it arrived with the BMS shut off and had to be jump-started before its Bluetooth showed 99 percent charge (December 2024), while an r/LiFePO4 commenter called Power Queen decent for a trolling motor (2025).

Google

+1 ECO-WORTHY
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
6.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
5.0

The Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery reading covers the whole brand.

What they say

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

  • On DIY Solar Forum, an owner running two EnergyTrek 314Ah units beside six EG4 rack batteries reported the Eco-Worthy pair showing about 90 percent state of charge when the EG4 bank read 100, a responsive display, and an app that drops its wireless connection while Bluetooth holds (August 2026).
  • Earlier posters in a February 2026 deal thread identified the V2 as using 314 Ah REPT cells and noted its BMS does not work with the Overkill (JBD) app.

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

  • On Expedition Portal and DIY Solar Forum, the owner of a 12 V 100 Ah trolling-motor battery bought in November 2023 measured 106 Ah but found the BMS cutting off charge near 13.9 V with its cells out of balance; Power Queen maintained the battery was fine, and he returned it through Amazon for a refund (February 2024).
  • On Swimbait Underground an angler running three 12.8 V 100 Ah batteries on his trolling motor posted positive first impressions (July 2024), and on DIY Solar Forum owners of the 12 V 200 Ah reported no problems in early use (December 2021).

YouTube

+2 Power Queen
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
5.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
7.0

The Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery reading covers the whole brand.

What they say

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

  • Mikes Solar Garage, which links the battery through an Eco-Worthy affiliate link with a 5 percent discount code and says reviewed products may be supplied free or discounted, measured about 325 Ah but found the low-temperature cut-off did not stop charging in a freezer test and the SOC gauge read 100 percent when the battery was about 95 percent discharged (August 2026, about 22,000 views).
  • Cleversolarpower, which carries affiliate links, measured 330 Ah, about 5 percent over rating, and reported three problems (August 2026, about 14,000 views).

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

  • Every tester found carries a tie.
  • Will Prowse, whose videos disclose paid promotion or free product and carry affiliate links, opened a Power Queen 12 V 200 Ah and found good build quality and consistent cells but no low-temperature charge protection (2022, about 600,000 views).
  • HOBOTECH, which Power Queen's store badges as recommended and which linked Power Queen batteries with its own discount codes, reviewed and tore down the 12 V 300 Ah (December 2022) and the 12 V 100 Ah trolling-motor battery (about 35,000 views).
  • Mike Builds, with Amazon affiliate links, paid $215 for a 12 V 100 Ah Bluetooth model and found its low-temperature cut-off worked (March 2025, about 8,800 views).

Amazon

+2 ECO-WORTHY
ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery
7.0
Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery
5.0

The Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery reading covers its product line.

What they say

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

  • Eco-Worthy's Amazon US listing for the 12V 314AH (B0DS3Y9TBQ, sold by ECO-WORTHY) reads 4.5 from 183 ratings, 80 percent five-star, 9 four-star, 2 three-star, 3 two-star and 6 one-star (October 2026).

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

  • Power Queen's Amazon US listing for the 12V 320Ah Mini with Bluetooth sold as a 3-pack (B0GYXYBV36) reads 4.6 from 3 ratings, 63 percent five-star and 37 four-star (October 2026).

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery vs Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery: pros and cons

What each one does well, and where it falls short.

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery

Strengths

  • 4,019 Wh in one 12 V battery
  • 64.2 Wh per pound on the spec weight
  • Bluetooth app and SOC LED panel built in
  • Storage mode switches off lights and Bluetooth for idle months
  • Up to 4 in parallel and 2 in series

Drawbacks

  • 200 A BMS is 0.64C on 314 Ah
  • No depth of discharge or end-of-life capacity published for the 6,000+ cycles
  • No CAN or RS485 port and no IP rating published
  • Weight given as 62.6 lb in the spec table and 60.4 lb in the page text
  • 3-year battery warrantythe store's Up To 10-Year badge covers home-storage models

Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery

Strengths

  • 4,096 Wh in one 12 V battery
  • 71.6 Wh per pound at 57.17 lb
  • Built-in Bluetooth 5.0 app monitoring
  • 1,000 A for 1 second3.13C
  • IP65 caseup to 4 in series and 4 in parallel

Drawbacks

  • 200 A BMS is 0.63C on 320 Ahcapping loads at 2,560 W
  • Weight 57.17 lb on the spec table52.47 lb in the FAQ
  • No end-of-life capacity published for the 4,000-cycle rating
  • Charging stops below 32°F0°C), with no self-heating
  • No CAN or RS485 port for closed-loop inverter communication

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery vs Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery: the numbers

Price, scores and rank, then only the specs that differ. Green marks the side with more.

5.6
Overall
Usability5.2
Social6.0

21st of 37 in LiFePO4

5.6
Overall
Usability5.7
Social5.5

21st of 37 in LiFePO4

  • Warranty
    ECO-WORTHY3 Years
    Power Queen More5 Years
  • Weight
    ECO-WORTHY62.6 lb
    Power Queen57.2 lb

Same on both

  • 12 VSystem voltage
  • 4,000-5,999 WhCapacity
  • Not listedPanel power
  • Not listedAC output
  • Not listedCharge current
  • Not listedCell type
  • Low-temperature cut-offLow-temperature charging
  • Bluetooth built inMonitoring
  • None verifiableSafety listings

We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.

Not sold on either one?

The top-scored and the cheapest other pick from each brand.

More from ECO-WORTHY 4 scored in LiFePO4 Batteries

What’s different
  • Capacity: 3,000-3,999 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifFeatures matters5vs4
ECO-WORTHY 12V 100Ah Bluetooth LiFePO4 Battery
5.8
What’s different
  • Capacity: 1,000-1,499 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifOperating range matters5vs1

More from Power Queen 7 scored in LiFePO4 Batteries

What’s different
  • Capacity: 3,000-3,999 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifOperating range matters5vs1
Power Queen 12V 100Ah Group 31 Classic LiFePO4 Battery
5.9
What’s different
  • Capacity: 1,000-1,499 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
  • Safety listings: adds UL 1973 listed
Pick it ifVerification matters6vs2UL 1973 listed only on the 12V 100Ah Group 31 Battery

ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery vs Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery: common questions

Is the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery better than the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery?

Neither, on our scores: 5.6 against 5.6 is inside the margin one scoring judgement can move. The ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery leads on lifespan (8 against 6). The Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery leads on warranty & support (6 against 4), features (6 against 4) and efficiency (10 against 8).

Which is cheaper, the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery or the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery?

The ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery, at $500 against $733: $233 less.

Which has the longer warranty, the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery or the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery?

The Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery: 5 Years, against 3 Years.

What do owners say about the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery and the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery?

Across 4 independent sources scored for both, the ECO-WORTHY EnergyTrek 12V 314Ah Battery is ahead on Reddit, Google and Amazon; the Power Queen 12V 320Ah Bluetooth Battery is ahead on YouTube.

More lifepo4 batteries comparisons

More head-to-heads with these two, plus the full brand comparison.

Scores calculated 13 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them ·  · How we score

Stuff VS Things
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Versus
0
Shopping cart