Anker SOLIXPS200 BifacialvsGoal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial scores 5.0 and ranks 15th of 39 in Portable Solar Panels; the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel scores 4.1 and ranks 32nd of 39 in Portable Solar Panels. The PS200 Bifacial leads on efficiency.
Across everything we scored, Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial sits 0.87 ahead — led by efficiency.
Verdict
PS200 Bifacial ahead · +0.87 (5.0 vs 4.1)
Pick the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial when
Efficiency matters10vs1
Features matters8vs2
Warranty & support matters6vs3
Pick the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel when
A criterion we do not score decides itthe Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel leads on none of the ones we do
Scored 17 October 2026 from published specs and owner reviews. We don't buy or test units. How we score
Usability Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial and Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel, scored 0 to 10
Anker SOLIXPS200 BifacialGoal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
EfficiencyAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 10 (higher)Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 1
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
18.3 percent computed from 1377 x 792 mm, on the 18 percent or more rung
Marketed: conversion efficiency of 25 percent and more, against the computed module figure
Size: a Japanese edition of the guide gives 1430 x 792 mm, which would compute 17.7 percent
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
10.9 percent computed from 28.2 x 100.7 in, on the below 12 percent rung
Cells: monocrystalline; no cell architecture or cell efficiency published
FeaturesAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 8 (higher)Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 2
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
IP68, bifacial, built-in stand and an XT-60i lead in the box; no front material or diode count
Stand: one main tilt near 35 degrees with slight adjustment; Anker's support page gives 35 to 55 degrees
Range: rated from −4 to 140 °F (−20 to 60 °C), with a 75 V DC maximum system voltage
Diodes: the guide names Schottky bypass diodes but gives no count
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Pop-out legs only; no IP rating, front sheet, MC4 lead or diode count
Ports: USB-A 5 V 2.4 A and a fixed 6 ft High Power Port cable, stored in a mesh pouch
Connector: the 2020 manual calls the lead an Anderson Powerpole; the page calls it High Power Port
Weather: Goal Zero calls the Nomads weatherproof and publishes no IP rating
Chaining: panels join through a 4x High Power Port combiner, sold separately at $39.95
VerificationAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 4 (higher)Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 2
only the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: Certificate published; only the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: None verifiable.
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
third-party TÜV SÜD PPP 58200B certificate Z2 127148 0347 by model; no UL 61730 listing.
Searched: TÜV SÜD Intertek UL Certipedia SGS CEC LabTest
Record: TÜV SÜD, PPP 58200B:2022 (Consumer Photovoltaics, design qualification and type approval), AS340, AS320, Anker Innovations Limited
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
No directory listing for model 11930; EU declaration cites EMC and RoHS only
Searched: Intertek UL CEC LabTest TÜV SÜD Certipedia SGS
Standard: UL 61730 needed for a listing
Claim: EU declaration 2020-Nomad 200 cites EN 55032/55035 EMC and RoHS; manual adds FCC Part 15
Maker: built by Shenzhen Topray Solar; none of its TÜV SÜD or Certipedia records names 11930
Holder: Goal Zero LLC; its only directory records are stations, fridges and cables, no panel
Warranty & SupportAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 6 (higher)Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 3
Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5 Years · Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 2 Years.
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
60 months in Anker's warranty policy; five years on the product page and datasheet
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
2 years in Goal Zero's warranty policy and on the product page
Manual: the 2020 user guide prints 12 months; the current policy says 2 years
Same score
CapacityAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 5
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
200 W rated at STC, on the 200 to 219 W rung for portable panels
Electrical: 48 V and 4.16 A at maximum power, 57.6 V open circuit and 4.38 A short circuit in the datasheet
Rear face: Anker claims up to 10 percent more from the rear; the score reads the front-side rating
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
200 W rated, on the 200 to 219 W rung for portable panels
Electrical: 19.1 V at maximum power, 23.0 V open circuit, up to 14 A from the High Power Port
LifespanAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 1Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 1
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
No power-output warranty published; the 10-year lifespan is a claim, not a guarantee
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
No power-output warranty on the product page, in the policy or in the manual
Not scored for either
Operating RangeAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: —not scoredGoal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: —not scored
ValueAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: —not scoredGoal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: —not scored
Social score about the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial and the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Anker SOLIXPS200 BifacialGoal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
RedditAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 3Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 4 (higher)
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand; the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel reading covers the whole brand.
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
Read the full summary
r/anker: an F2600 owner read about 260 W from Anker's 400 W folding panel aimed at a clear sky in eastern Pennsylvania and asked whether it was defective (July 2024)
r/SolarDIY: a C1000 owner never saw an Anker 200 W panel and a second-brand 220 W panel pass 120 W combined in direct sun; commenters blamed mismatched wiring (March 2026)
r/SolarDIY: in the same thread another owner said his Anker 200 W folding panels were lucky to draw 100 W in full summer sun in Tampa (March 2026)
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Read the full summary
r/OffGrid: an owner running a 200 W Goal Zero panel with two Yeti 1000X stations said it powered a 21 ft travel trailer through months of remote living and worked great (April 2025)
Price: in the same thread two owners called Goal Zero's prices steep, one of them running several of its stations on solar without trouble (April 2025)
r/SolarDIY: a Boulder 100 Briefcase that arrived with cracked glass on one half still gave about 40 to 52 W, per its owner (October 2025)
r/preppers: a reply in an owner thread called Goal Zero's solar gear overpriced and of mediocre quality (February 2021)
GoogleAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 6 (higher)
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand.
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
Read the full summary
OutdoorGearLab: buys its test units, earns Amazon commission; measured 166 W from the earlier four-fold PS200, 83 percent of rated, ranking it 4th of 12 at a score of 79 (July 2026)
Faulted: OutdoorGearLab names short cables and a high price for an average performer (July 2026)
How-To Geek: links Amazon with an affiliate tag and does not say how it got the unit; read 97 W from the earlier 625 100 W panel in sun and 55 to 73 W under cloud, scoring it 7 of 10 (December 2022)
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Liked
162 to 182 W into a Yeti 1500X in full sun (YuenX)
Compact and protected when folded (YuenX)
Complaints
Heavy for its output (YuenX)
Sags into sand while setting the legs (YuenX)
Vertical plug orientation (YuenX)
Read the full summary
YuenX: a blog review read 162 to 182 W from the Nomad 200 into a Yeti 1500X in California sun (November 2020, published January 2021)
Clouds: the same review read 63 W on a cloudy late afternoon
Dislikes: its 22 lb weight, the panel sagging into sand while the legs are set, and a vertical plug
Ties: the review carries Amazon and Goal Zero affiliate links and does not say how the panel was obtained
YouTubeAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 6 (higher)
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand.
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
Read the full summary
RANDOMFIX: earns Amazon commission on tagged products; ran the earlier 531 200 W panel for three weeks with a C1000 and read 140 W and 178 W in partly sunny Texas conditions (February 2024, about 47,800 views)
TravelingWithTheReidhaars: bought his own 400 W folding panels from a dealer and on eBay; called them heavy, bulky and a pain for one person to set up on three kickstands (about June 2026, about 2,800 views)
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Liked
Up to 120 W in early-morning sun (ShotokuTech)
Complaints
Kickstands hard to set up alone (ShotokuTech)
Panel runs hot in direct sun (ShotokuTech)
Read the full summary
ShotokuTech: bought the Yeti 1000X + Nomad 200 kit on sale at Costco and read up to 120 W of input between about 8 and 9:40 am (November 2022, about 6,200 views)
Setup: he found the kickstands hard to set alone and suggests a second pair of hands
Heat: he packed the kit away as the panel neared 65 °C
AmazonAnker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: 7 (higher)
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial
Read the full summary
Listing: Anker's own Amazon US listing for the PS200 Bifacial (B0GY8LCH74), sold by AnkerDirect, 3.6 from 6 ratings (October 2026)
Split: 40 percent five-star, 20 four, 20 three, 0 two and 20 one-star; too few ratings to read much into (October 2026)
Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel
Read the full summary
Product.
Listing: Goal Zero LLC's Amazon US listing for the Nomad 200 (B08HRM6XFV), shipped by Amazon, reads 4.5 from 73 ratings: 78 percent five-star, 8 four, 5 three, 3 two, 6 one-star (October 2026)
Unless a row says otherwise, both readings are about these exact models.
Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial vs Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: pros and cons
Anker SOLIXPS200 Bifacial vs Goal ZeroNomad 200 Portable Solar Panel: common questions
Is the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial better than the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel?
On our scores, the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial is ahead, 5.0 against 4.1. The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial leads on efficiency (10 against 1), features (8 against 2), warranty & support (6 against 3) and verification (4 against 2).
Which is cheaper, the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial or the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel?
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial, at $500 against $600: $100 less.
Which has more safety listings, the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial or the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel?
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial. The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial lists Certificate published; the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel lists none.
Which has the longer warranty, the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial or the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel?
The Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial: 5 Years, against 2 Years.
What do owners say about the Anker SOLIX PS200 Bifacial and the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel?
Across 4 independent sources scored for both, the Goal Zero Nomad 200 Portable Solar Panel is ahead on Reddit, Google, YouTube and Amazon.
More portable solar panels comparisons
More head-to-heads with these two, plus the full brand comparison.
Scores calculated 17 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them · Researched and edited by Michael Ambrose · Unbroken Ads LLC · How we score