Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial vs BLUETTI PV350

• Warranty & SupportAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 6 (higher)BLUETTI PV350: 1

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 5 Years · BLUETTI PV350: 1 Year.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • 60 months in Anker's warranty policy; five years on the product page and datasheet

  BLUETTI PV350

  • 12 months in BLUETTI's warranty policy and on the product page
  • Superseded: the 2022 guide linked from BLUETTI's user-guide page prints 24 months
• CapacityAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 10 (higher)BLUETTI PV350: 8

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • 400 W rated at STC, on the 400 W or more rung for portable panels
  • Electrical: 48 V and 8.33 A at maximum power, 57.6 V open circuit and 8.75 A short circuit in the datasheet
  • Rear face: Anker claims up to 10 percent more from the rear; the score reads the front-side rating

  BLUETTI PV350

  • 350 W rated at STC, on the 300 to 399 W rung for portable panels
  • Electrical: 37 V and 9.5 A at maximum power, 44 V open circuit, 11.4 A short circuit
• EfficiencyAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 8 (higher)BLUETTI PV350: 5

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • 17.8 percent computed from 2292 x 983 mm, on the 17 to 17.9 percent rung
  • Marketed: conversion efficiency of 25 percent and more, against the computed module figure

  BLUETTI PV350

  • 15.7 percent computed over the guide's 2778 x 805 mm face, on the 15 to 15.9 percent rung
  • Marketed: up to 23.4 percent cell efficiency, against the computed module figure
  • Page size: the product page's 2810 x 785 mm face would read 15.9 percent, the same rung
• VerificationAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 4 (higher)BLUETTI PV350: 2

  only the Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: Certificate published; only the BLUETTI PV350: None verifiable.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • third-party TÜV SÜD PPP 58200B certificate Z2 127148 0347 by model; no UL 61730 listing.
  • Searched: TÜV SÜD Intertek UL Certipedia SGS CEC LabTest
  • Record: TÜV SÜD, PPP 58200B:2022 (Consumer Photovoltaics, design qualification and type approval), AS340, AS320, Anker Innovations Limited

  BLUETTI PV350

  • no directory record for the PV350; FCC, CE and RoHS marks only.
  • Searched: Intertek UL TÜV SÜD Certipedia SGS CEC LabTest
• FeaturesAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 8 (higher)BLUETTI PV350: 7

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • IP68, bifacial, built-in stand and an XT-60i lead in the box; no front material or diode count
  • Stand: one main tilt near 35 degrees with slight adjustment, per the product page's own FAQ
  • Range: rated from −4 to 140 °F (−20 to 60 °C), with a 75 V DC maximum system voltage
  • Diodes: the guide names Schottky bypass diodes but gives no count

  BLUETTI PV350

  • IP67, ETFE face, kickstand, MC4 to XT60 cable in the box; not bifacial, no diode data
  • Water: the page's FAQ and the 2022 guide say IP65, against IP67 in the current guide
  • Voltage: the page's feature text says 33 V open circuit; its spec table and the guide say 44 V

Same score

• LifespanAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 1BLUETTI PV350: 1

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  • No power-output warranty published; the 10-year lifespan is a claim, not a guarantee

  BLUETTI PV350

  • No power-output warranty on the product page or in the user guide

Not scored for either

• Operating RangeAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: —not scoredBLUETTI PV350: —not scored

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  Nothing recorded.

  BLUETTI PV350

  • Temperature: the guide rates it from 14 to 149 °F; the page says −13 to 149 °F
• ValueAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: —not scoredBLUETTI PV350: —not scored

• RedditAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 3BLUETTI PV350: 5 (higher)

  The Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV350 reading covers the whole brand.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  Read the full summary

  • r/anker: an F2600 owner read about 260 W from Anker's 400 W folding panel aimed at a clear sky in eastern Pennsylvania and asked whether it was defective (July 2024)
  • r/SolarDIY: a C1000 owner never saw an Anker 200 W panel and a second-brand 220 W panel pass 120 W combined in direct sun; commenters blamed mismatched wiring (March 2026)
  • r/SolarDIY: in the same thread another owner said his Anker 200 W folding panels were lucky to draw 100 W in full summer sun in Tampa (March 2026)

  BLUETTI PV350

  Read the full summary

  • r/SurvivalGear: an owner of an AC60 and PV200 read about 150 W of input once a part-cloudy sky cleared and 40 to 50 W under passing cloud, and liked both (September 2023)
  • Caveat: the same owner called it an initial evaluation and said he would need longer use to judge durability (September 2023)
• GoogleAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 5BLUETTI PV350: 7 (higher)

  The Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV350 reading covers its product line.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  Read the full summary

  • OutdoorGearLab: buys its test units, earns Amazon commission; measured 166 W from the earlier four-fold PS200, 83 percent of rated, ranking it 4th of 12 at a score of 79 (July 2026)
  • Faulted: OutdoorGearLab names short cables and a high price for an average performer (July 2026)
  • How-To Geek: links Amazon with an affiliate tag and does not say how it got the unit; read 97 W from the earlier 625 100 W panel in sun and 55 to 73 W under cloud, scoring it 7 of 10 (December 2022)

  BLUETTI PV350

  Read the full summary

  • StorageReview: tested the earlier 2400 x 905 mm PV350, read a 295 W peak in clear midday sun and 38 W through tree cover, and called it a solid field option (September 2023)
  • Gear Diary: one earlier-revision PV350 charged a BLUETTI AC200MAX from 10 percent in 7 to 10 hours (September 2023); its policy says reviewed products usually come from the maker
• YouTubeAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 5BLUETTI PV350: 7 (higher)

  The Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV350 reading covers its product line.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  Read the full summary

  • RANDOMFIX: earns Amazon commission on tagged products; ran the earlier 531 200 W panel for three weeks with a C1000 and read 140 W and 178 W in partly sunny Texas conditions (February 2024, about 47,800 views)
  • TravelingWithTheReidhaars: bought his own 400 W folding panels from a dealer and on eBay; called them heavy, bulky and a pain for one person to set up on three kickstands (about June 2026, about 2,800 views)

  BLUETTI PV350

  Read the full summary

  • Bowman's Woods: set the folding PV350 against 400 W of glass panels and titled the result a win in both sun and shade (May 2023, about 25,000 views)
  • The Solar Lab: compared it with the SORA 500 and said the older 350 W panel has features that may make it the better choice for some uses (September 2026, about 12,000 views)
  • Disclosure: The Solar Lab's description carries BLUETTI affiliate links and a discount code
• AmazonAnker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial: 6BLUETTI PV350: 7 (higher)

  The Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial reading covers the whole brand; the BLUETTI PV350 reading covers its product line.

  Anker SOLIX PS400 Bifacial

  Read the full summary

  • Earlier PS400 (B0BWQJ19M4): 4.2 from 97 ratings; Amazon's summary calls power output mixed, with some buyers reporting under half the rated watts (August 2026)
  • Earlier PS200 (B0BK8YWY9Q): 4.1 from 139 ratings, now unavailable, with mixed feedback on output, quality and weight (October 2026)
  • Bifacial line: the PS100 Bifacial reads 4.3 from 9 ratings (August 2026) and the PS200 Bifacial 3.6 from 6 (October 2026)

  BLUETTI PV350

  Read the full summary

  • Listing: BLUETTI's Amazon US listing for the 350W panel (B09SD23Y6V) reads 4.3 from 194 ratings: 70 percent five-star, 11 four, 8 three, 2 two, 9 one-star (October 2026)
  • File: the listing still shows the earlier revision's 35.6 x 24.1 in folded size and 30.6 lb, so its ratings span both revisions