Product comparison · LiFePO4 Batteries
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery vs ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
The LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery scores 6.2 and ranks 1st of 21 in LiFePO4 Batteries; the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery scores 5.5 and ranks 17th of 21 in LiFePO4 Batteries. The 12V 320Ah Mini Battery leads on efficiency, the EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery on capacity.
All 25 LiTime products 
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
$830 · 1st of 21 in LiFePO4 Batteries
Buy Now- Efficiency — 10 against 6
6.2
5.5
All 20 ECO-WORTHY products 
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
$680 · 17th of 21 in LiFePO4 Batteries
Buy Now- Capacity — 10 against 9
Across everything we scored, LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery sits 0.74 ahead — led by efficiency.
Verdict
12V 320Ah Mini Battery ahead · +0.74 (6.2 vs 5.5)Pick the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery when
Efficiency matters10vs6
Warranty & support matters6vs4
Features matters6vs4
Pick the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery when
Capacity matters10vs9
Price matters$680vs$830
Scored 13 October 2026 from published specs and owner reviews. We don't buy or test units. How we score
Most common complaints
From each product's own owner reviews and retailer ratings.
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
- No lifting-strap holes, per Notebookcheck
- LiTime app not very impressive, per one owner
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
- Heavier than a LiTime 12V 300Ah
- Costs more than two 280Ah metal-case units on sale
- Cell configuration not stated by Eco-Worthy
Where the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery and ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery differ
Scores on a 0–10 scale. Each row is one criterion, biggest difference first.
Features
+2 LiTimeWarranty & Support
+2 LiTimeLiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery: 5 Years · ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery: 3 Years.
Capacity
+1 ECO-WORTHYOperating Range
tiedVerification
tiedLifespan
one side unscoredValue
one side unscoredWhat LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery and ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery owners report
Independent sources, scored for each model. 12V 320Ah Mini Battery on 4 of five, EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery on 4.
The LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery reading covers the whole brand; the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery reading covers the whole brand.
What they say
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
- Reddit owners split on LiTime and Ampere Time 12 V batteries.
- In an r/vandwellers thread an owner calls his Ampere Time 100Ah fantastic (July 2024), and replies in an r/SolarDIY thread on 24 V banks say LiTime batteries have been torn down many times and the build quality is excellent (March 2026).
- Against that, an r/boating owner's 100Ah lost its BMS after 10 cycles and LiTime, having agreed it was defective, stopped answering about the return (October 2025), and an r/OffGrid owner of 16 Ampere Time batteries reports BMS failures at 1.5 years and a support team that blamed his charging and wiring (January 2024).
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
- Reddit owners mostly report Eco-Worthy batteries holding their rated capacity and are less sure of its electronics.
- In an r/SolarDIY thread owners said their 100 Ah batteries tested to capacity and that two 12 V 260 Ah batteries in series stayed balanced for a year (February 2024), a UK owner measured nearly 102 Ah from a 12.8 V 100 Ah battery after a year on standby against 104.3 Ah new (June 2025), and in a Renogy-or-Eco-Worthy thread an owner called its batteries and panels fine and its charge controllers and inverters hit and miss (February 2026).
Both readings are about these exact models.
What they say
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
- Notebookcheck, which LiTime sent the battery with its 3000 W inverter, 60 A charger and 60 A MPPT controller, found the 320Ah Mini compact and solid, its app's readings matched a clamp meter, its Bluetooth reached about 15 m and it ran a 400 W heater for over 9 hours near freezing, but it has no lifting-strap holes (October 2025).
- On DIY Solar Forum an owner running two in parallel as a boat's inverter bank said they have worked fine but found the LiTime app not very impressive (September 2025).
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
- In a DIY Solar Forum thread on the 12V 400Ah (June to July 2026), one owner who bought it for about $500 called the form factor perfect for his sailboat, while other posters said it weighs more than a LiTime 12V 300Ah and costs more than two Eco-Worthy 280Ah metal-case batteries on sale.
YouTube
tiedThe ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery reading covers the whole brand.
What they say
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
- All three testers found carry a tie.
- Outside by Side, whose review is marked as paid promotion, called it the best RV and off-grid battery of 2026 (December 2025, about 8,800 views).
- Proficient Prepper, which links it with a referral code and a LiTime discount code, said the LiTime batteries it has reviewed have been good quality and lived up to their advertising (November 2025, about 41,000 views).
- VideoShowMeHow, which offers a discount code, fitted a pair to an off-road caravan as the 12 V upgrade it had been looking for and noted a footprint barely bigger than an old 100Ah AGM (May 2026, about 6,300 views).
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
- Every tester found carries a tie.
- Will Prowse, whose videos disclose paid promotion or free product and carry affiliate links, found Eco-Worthy's $799 48 V server-rack battery passed his deep-dive tests (2025, about 154,000 views).
- Mike Builds, whose Cubix 100 video is marked as paid promotion and links Eco-Worthy's affiliate program, measured 99.08 Ah at 0.2C and called it a beast (July 2026, about 218,000 views).
- There's A Trick For That, which links the battery through Amazon affiliate links, drew 315 Ah, 105 percent of rating, from a 12 V 300 Ah (April 2026, about 25,000 views).
Amazon
+2 LiTimeBoth readings are about these exact models.
What they say
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
- LiTime's Amazon US listing for the 12V 320Ah Mini (B0FH587YQG, sold by Li Time US) reads 4.6 from 153 ratings (October 2026); the star split was not shown.
- A second 320Ah Mini listing (B0GWD7K4F4) shows 519 ratings shared with LiTime's 230Ah Bluetooth listing, so it is not read here.
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
- Eco-Worthy's Amazon US listing for the 12V 400AH Metal Case (B0H2M9VYD9, sold by ECO-WORTHY US) reads 4.8 from 7 ratings, too few to weigh heavily (October 2026).
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery vs ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery: pros and cons
What each one does well, and where it falls short.
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery
Strengths
- 71.6 Wh per pound at 57.17 lb
- Bluetooth 5.0 app monitoring built in
- Charging stops below 32°F and resumes at 41°F
- IP65 case
- Up to 16 batteries in 4S4P65.5 kWh
Drawbacks
- 200 A BMS is 0.63C on 320 Ah
- No CAN or RS485 communication port
- No self-heatingthe heated 320Ah Mini is a separate model
- Cycle rating publishes no end-of-life capacity
- Product page and manual give different dimensions
ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery
Strengths
- 5,120 Wh in one 12 V battery
- Metal case with built-in mounting feet
- Bluetooth monitoring built in
- Separate low-current safety switch to cut output
- Connects to 4S or 4Pup to 8 batteries
Drawbacks
- 250 A maximum continuous BMS is 0.63C on 400 Ah
- No cycle rating published
- No user manual linked on the product page
- No CAN or RS485 port and no IP rating published
- 3-year battery warrantythe store's Up To 10-Year badge covers home-storage models
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery vs ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery: the numbers
Price, scores and rank, then only the specs that differ. Green marks the side with more.
- WarrantyLiTime More5 YearsECO-WORTHY3 Years
- WeightLiTime57.2 lbECO-WORTHY90.2 lb
Same on both
- 12 VSystem voltage
- 4,000-5,999 WhCapacity
- Not listedPanel power
- Not listedAC output
- Not listedCharge current
- Not listedCell type
- Low-temperature cut-offLow-temperature charging
- Bluetooth built inMonitoring
- None verifiableSafety listings
We earn a commission if you buy through these links. It never changes a score.
Not sold on either one?
The top-scored and the cheapest other pick from each brand.
More from LiTime 7 scored in LiFePO4 Batteries
What’s different
- Capacity: 2,000-2,999 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifOperating range matters5vs1
What’s different
- Capacity: 1,000-1,499 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
- Safety listings: adds UL 1973 listed
Pick it ifVerification matters6vs2UL 1973 listed only on the 12V 100Ah Battery
More from ECO-WORTHY 4 scored in LiFePO4 Batteries
What’s different
- Capacity: 3,000-3,999 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifFeatures matters5vs4
What’s different
- Capacity: 1,000-1,499 Wh, not 4,000-5,999 Wh
Pick it ifOperating range matters5vs1
LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery vs ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery: common questions
Is the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery better than the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery?
On our scores, the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery is ahead, 6.2 against 5.5. The LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery leads on efficiency (10 against 6), warranty & support (6 against 4) and features (6 against 4). The ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery leads on capacity (10 against 9).
Which is cheaper, the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery or the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery?
The ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery, at $680 against $830: $150 less.
Which has the longer warranty, the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery or the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery?
The LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery: 5 Years, against 3 Years.
What do owners say about the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery and the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery?
Across 4 independent sources scored for both, the LiTime 12V 320Ah Mini Battery is ahead on Google and Amazon; the ECO-WORTHY EnergyRock 12V 400Ah Battery is ahead on Reddit; YouTube is level.
More lifepo4 batteries comparisons
More head-to-heads with these two, plus the full brand comparison.
Scores calculated 13 October 2026 · Products excluded where fewer than two independent sources cover them · · How we score